Recycling Reconsidered by Samantha
MacBride’s talks about how the idea of “more recycling is better” has emerged
in our society. The recycling movement has de-emphasized other areas of sustainability
concentration. Recycling is seen as the key success factor for
environmentalism, when it really isn’t. Consumers used to have refillable
bottles in the early 1900s. There were deposit redemptions under civil law to
make sure people returned their bottles. Then there was an establishment of the
one-way, no deposit, and no return beer can that emerged in the late 1950s. It
was more convenient for customers and distributors. Other bottling companies
imitated to compete. Plastic bottles were later added to the list. Though recycling
a glass bottle saves from the extraction of 100% virgin materials, it uses a
lot more energy compared to items like metal and paper. Glass recycling requires
so much energy it is not an economically or environmentally smart option, yet
that is the way our system currently is. It costs way more money to completely
recycle glass than it would to refill it with a liquid. In all honesty, it is
disappointing that our society doesn’t have refillable bottles anymore. It
would create an incentive for people not to waste their bottles because they
would lose money that way. Glass recycling is seen as busy-ness, because central
effort towards sustainability is not achieved.
MacBride also talked about how individuals
concerned with the environment care more about glass waste, and not as much
with textile waste. Less glass is thrown away than textiles per year, yet more
glass is reclaimed for reintroduction into the economy each year. Textile waste
isn’t discussed to the same extent as glass waste. Textiles require a lot of
energy and heavily pollute in the manufacturing process. MacBride states that
demand for textiles diverts less than 15% of textile waste generated annually. So
here you are seeing a society that has high demands for new things, but not for
the old. Too many unwanted items are donated to places like Goodwill, Salvation
Army and thrift shops. There is only so much demand for your old high school
soccer t-shirt. These secondhand stores can only sell items in demand.
Reading about textile waste made me
think about the documentary I watched in an anthropology titled ‘T-Shirt
Travels.’ Before watching this documentary, I had imagined my t-shirts staying
in the United States for someone in need. But after watching this documentary,
I better understood how our society buys clothing not out of need, but desire. We
clean out our closets and donate unwanted clothes with little life to charity.
People feel good, thinking “I’ve cleaned out my closet while helping someone in
need. Places like Goodwill and Salvation Army can only accept so many donations
and use them for resale. Other clothes go to countries like Zambia mentioned in
T-shirt Travels. What you see is an entire economy ruined due to many factors.
After establishing independence, Zambia spent a lot of money in things like
schools, hospitals, and other needs while industrial manufacturing thrived. But
once the money ran out, Zambia cut out on subsidies and people lost their jobs.
A domino affect hit the country which included the shutdown of textile factories.
Much of our old clothing goes to places like Zambia where people buy them for
cheap prices. The people who sell the clothing are barely making it, as the
trade barely covers food, shelter, and maybe education for their family. People
in Zambia don’t buy from their local textile industry because it is too
expensive. Our unwanted textiles can hurt other economies by making them become
import-dependent countries. This movie really made me reconsider my consumption
patterns and what I buy. I have bought clothing and never worn it. Our society
is so concentrated on buying more and more stuff. After all, shopping is one of
America’s favorite pastimes. Instead of repairing, sewing, and reusing clothes
like in the old times, we buy completely new clothes. Now you have a large
percentage of the population who doesn’t know how to sew. Our society has
changed from a reuse society to a throwaway society when things like clothing
get slightly damaged. Before we purchase textiles, we should think of the implications.
Textiles are one of the most polluting industries, but we are purchasing more
clothing than ever before. Consumerism of textiles needs to be reconsidered.
Bloeman, S. (2001). T-Shirt
Travels. United States of America. IMDb.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.